Adobe Photoshop CS4

Written by admin


Overall Rating55555
Usability4.864.864.864.864.86
Value for Money4.574.574.574.574.57
Beginner Friendly?4.864.864.864.864.86

compare

There’s just enough that’s better in the CS4 updates to Photoshop and Photoshop Extended–most notably, usability improvements for core features–that many people will find themselves sighing, biting the bullet, and upgrading. If you work with video or 3D, or want to update your Creative Suite to CS4 for other reasons, this is a no-brainer; for the rest of us, there’s little you can do with CS4 that you couldn’t do with CS3, and the latter seems a bit faster and more memory efficient in some respects. The Web abounds with complaints about Adobe’s installer and updater, and I think most are quite justified. Every Windows application installer suggests you close any running applications, but you can usually ignore it and 99 percent of the time everything works out fine. Adobe forces you to close your browser and all Microsoft Office applications, because many of the programs in the suite–primarily Acrobat–spread octopus-like tentacles throughout your working environment. That’s pretty appalling in and of itself, but in addition to wasting a large chunk of time installing, you can’t do anything else but play Solitaire while it’s happening. And as before with the updater, you’ll get to relive this delightful close-your-apps-or-else experience on a regular basis. Even as I type it’s stopped dead waiting for me to close Firefox. Plus, the installation “progress” bar bears no relation to reality whatsoever, with its two steps forward and one step back movement. Over and over again. All of this adds up to a one-point demerit for Adobe on its Setup and Interface rating.

In some ways this version feels like a necessary evil. Adobe has obviously put a lot of work into it, but most of it is under the hood–way under the hood from the perspective of the everyday user. The entire 3D engine (in Extended) has been migrated from a PDF-based architecture to OpenGL, and the company has seeded OpenGL support throughout the application. The panels architecture is now extensible via Flash, allowing people to create their own panels or modify some of the existing ones (you can try it yourself using Adobe Configurator). And via the release of the Pixel Bender SDK, the filter library is not only extensible but has baked-in GPU and multicore acceleration. All of this is essential in order to allow future versions of Photoshop to evolve. However, the move to support 64-bit Windows, and multitouch inputs and 16-bit printing on the Mac are likely the real technology changes that will significantly impact everyday users of this version.

Photoshop CS4 Extended users will benefit more immediately from these underlying changes than Standard users. For the latter, OpenGL support primarily manifests itself as some whizzy screen zooming and rotation tools that demo well but likely won’t get used much. However, Adobe has greatly improved Extended’s 3D support. It now offers most of the essential render settings and view controls, plus the ability to create primitives (and extend the library of primitives), necessary to work with 3D models. You edit and paint on textures simply by double-clicking on them in the Layers palette, then see your changes applied when you toggle back to the model; not quite real-time, interactive painting, but close enough for now. And now there’s basic keyframe animation for 3D scenes. Still there’s room for improvement: it needs better lighting handling and the ability to tile and more easily position textures, and several aspects of the interface, like the Rendering options, are still far too dialog-driven. And Photoshop gets very slow when you load (or generate via the Mesh from grayscale command) relatively complex models with tens of thousands of polygons.

European Startups with Jobs at startups can be found here, but that mixture of real-time and dialog-driven action still permeates the interface of Photoshop in general, despite some advances. For example, if you use Photoshop for Web or print production work, the move to modeless Adjustment and Masks panels for real-time adjustments to preview changes in mask feathering and density is potentially a huge time-saver. But all the ancillary operations, such as the Radius, Contrast, Smooth, (another) Feather, and Contract/Expand parameters controlled by Refine Mask, remain in a modal dialog box.

A familiar view
A familiar view

So while there are a few tweaks, such as the new tabbed windows (you can still float ‘em, though) and jarring all-caps text, long-time users won’t encounter a lot of user interface differences to slow down their work flow. On the upside, tool shortcut keys now behave in what Adobe refers to as a “spring loaded” fashion. That means that if you hold down the shortcut key for one tool while another is selected in the toolbar, it temporarily overrides the toolbar until you release the key. Very nice. On the other hand, I don’t particularly like the icon representations of the adjustments in the new panel–you can’t tell what they are without mousing over them and reading the text–but you can just ignore them and use the adjustment layer pop-up on the Layers palette as always.

Aside from the real-time adjustments, there’s not a lot new here for Photoshop’s core photo-editing audience. Adobe Camera Raw is now up to version 5.x, and has been brought more into sync with the way Lightroom handles files. It includes local retouching brushes like that application, though I suspect the quick fixes for which they’re intended are less important when opening in Photoshop than in Lightroom. And now that you’ve trained yourself not to use Dodge, Burn, and Sponge–because they’ve worked so poorly for the last 10- plus versions–Adobe has fixed them, by limiting the areas of the tonal range they apply to. The Vibrance control, a saturation adjustment that preserves skin tones and which has made it into all the other Adobe photo applications, finally comes to Photoshop as well. Also useful (some might say overdue), the Clone Stamp and Healing brushes now display a preview of what it will be stamping or healing, and brush size in general is now interactive.

Adobe has also tweaked the Color Range Select tool, adding the ability to limit the selection to “Localized Color Clusters.” It sounds nice, but I couldn’t get it to work well in any meaningful way; rather than limit it to contiguous colors that meet the specified criteria, as I expected, it seemed to limit the range to a user-specified-size circle around a sample point. An extension of the old Auto Align and Auto Blend capabilities combines the sharpest areas of several layers of similar images, which Adobe promotes as delivering an extended depth-of-field image. In practice, you have to be very careful or you’ll end up with an odd mixture of blur and sharp that bears no resemblance to anything producible with a camera. Those image combination scripts have also been beefed up with vignette (edge darkening) and fish-eye distortion correction when creating panoramas.

Content-Aware scaling, Adobe’s implementation of seam-carving technology, seems slightly more cooked than it seemed while I was beta testing the software, but it’s not quite ready for prime time. For one thing, it’s slow; though it’s OK while you interact with it, when it comes time to apply, it can take a while. Also, if you leave it on, the program defaults, and you’ll get an unholy mess. Always dial it back to at least 50 percent. The fact that you should really use a rough mask to protect important areas will slow down your work flow. Finally, it can leave behind tons of contouring artifacts.

Photoshop also has much better integration with Lightroom 2.1. You can jump seamlessly back and forth without any of the onerous saving and manual refreshing required by an earlier version of this capability. You make adjustments in LR, then open it in Photoshop, save, and jump back to Lightroom.

Of course, there’s the inevitable disappointment with the stuff Adobe hasn’t changed, such as the poor print layout controls and embarrassingly primitive text handling.

There’s more, of course, but nothing that screams, “I’m going to make your life easier!” Which is why I suspect users will be sighing when they plunk down the cash for the upgrade rather than eagerly anticipating all the fun times ahead. Maybe that will come with CS5, when the fruits of Adobe’s technological labors have ripened and left the sanctuary of Adobe Labs for the wild.

compare

 

Do you have any experiences with Adobe Photoshop CS4? We would love to hear from you and get your opinion! Please see rating section below!

 
 

 

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: , , ,

Posted on: December 8, 2009

Filed under: Adobe Photoshop CS4

7 Reviews

Janes

December 10th, 2009 at 6:44 pm    


Overall Rating55555
Usability55555
Value for Money55555
Beginner Friendly?55555

CS4 is my first purchase of the full version of Photoshop. I have used Paint Shop Pro since version 5, and I have used Photoshop Elements 6 for about 15 months. I have long avoided purchasing the full version of Photoshop, not because I didn’t want it, but for two reasons: the price, and the proliferation of negative reviews, especially the reviews that describe installation nightmares. Two things convinced me to finally buy it: a generous coupon from Amazon, and some reviews that describe preliminary steps to avoid problems before and after installation, such as going to the website of the video card and downloading the latest drivers. My installation succeeded without a hitch. It is not my intention to indicate that those reviews about installation problems are invalid, only that my own experience was the opposite.

I was already very familiar with using selections, layers and masks, so all I have seen and heard about a ’steep learning curve’ has seemed exaggerated to me. I’m having an absolute blast discovering all the convenience designed into Photoshop CS4: the non-destructive adjustment layers; Camera Raw plug-in; the quick and accurate zooming tools; the amazing preview options; Bridge and its organization capabilities. On and on I could go. I remember one review that indicated that distinguishing a Photoshop edited photo from the same photo edited by less expensive software might prove difficult or impossible. I have worked with those less expensive softwares long enough to know better than to deny the truth of that assertion. But, I believe there is much to be said about how you get there, and how much time consumption and frustration can be eliminated by learning Photoshop and availing yourself of the editing convenience designed into it. Editing that is tedious in less expensive software is downright fun in Photoshop! The reviewer also mentioned that the most difficult to edit photos, the ones where detail has to be brought out from too much shadow or too much brightness, are the ones where Photoshop has no peer. He is spot on with that assertion.

Those who assert that Photoshop is best left to the pros are consummately wrong. Serious hobbyists will find just as much satisfaction, and perhaps even more, since hobbies don’t involve meeting professional deadlines and such. There is much to learn in Photoshop, but the learning is easy and fun. Resources are everywhere, many of them free.

I do very much disagree with those who trash the interface of CS4. I believe it is deliberately designed to not compete with the photo being edited. I find it to be a paragon of economy and utility: invisible when I’m concentrating on my work, yet available to quickly provide accurate tools and a convenient editing and/or reviewing environment once I decide what I’m going to do next. If editing in an interface replete with gaudy eye candy is your wont, Photoshop is not for you.

I will close with my own little disclaimer: I’m not paid by Amazon, Adobe or anyone else for my thoughts. I’m retired from all employment, and digital photography is my favorite hobby and pastime. I do it for myself, my family and my friends. I’ve wondered about Photoshop and wanted to try it for a long time. Thanks to the generosity of Amazon, I now own Photoshop CS4! Thanks to Adobe, I am now a true believer! I repeat, I’m having an absolute blast!


Marcus

December 10th, 2009 at 6:44 pm    


Overall Rating55555
Usability55555
Value for Money55555
Beginner Friendly?55555

** UPDATE VIDEO CARD DRIVER:
Right off the bat I had a problem with my brush cursor only showing 1/4, 1/2, and even sometimes only a 1/5 of the cursor when I zoomed in. Found out from Adobe that I needed to install the latest video card driver. I had done this only a few weeks before the program was installed, but went to the EVGA site and re-downloaded the driver and re-installed it. It fixed the cursor problem upon restart. No mater what, go to your video card’s website and download the latest driver, even if you think yours is updated.

** GPU and OpenGL Features and Limitations in Photoshop CS4:
Upon start-up, PS asks if you want to go to this website to review the tasks CS4 asks of the video card. I HIGHLY recommend you review it:

http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb404898

Very smart in how they are now tasking the video card to offload some of the processing from the CPU. If you turn off the GPU processing support (edit > preferences > performance) you will notice a small drop in performance. Read the list on the website above and you will see why you need a good fast Video card.

** 3D FEATURE NOW ADDED TO PS!:
We now have a powerful 3D rendering feature, just like Illustrator does. (But, not so powerful if you video card is lagging behind.) Turn off GPU processing, and use a weak CPU and you will find yourself making coffee during 3D rendering.

** WORKS WITH CS3:
I have both CS3 and CS4 installed at the same time. No problems using both, only you can’t use them at the same time.

** NEW USER INTERFACE… UGLY:
I don’t know who picked the font for the UI in CS4, but they should never be in charge of that part again. Horrible chunky font used throughout the interface. Why change from CS3? And the pallets are squared off. CS3’s pallets were so nice; why change?


Claudia

December 10th, 2009 at 6:45 pm    


Overall Rating55555
Usability55555
Value for Money55555
Beginner Friendly?55555

A new (not an upgrade and not “OEM”) copy of the most recent version of Adobe Photoshop was advertised for an extremely unusual price. This causes most of us some apprehension, but what I received has turned out to be in every way what was promised. I have been able to register and update it without any problem, and have encountered nothing to indicate that it is anything other than what was advertised. And of course, there is no substitute for Photoshop. This transaction gives me a lot of confidence in Amazon.


Gustav

December 10th, 2009 at 6:45 pm    


Overall Rating55555
Usability55555
Value for Money55555
Beginner Friendly?55555

I am rather stunned that the current Amazon rating for this product is about 3 stars. I would rate it 5 stars except that it is priced too high. Aside from the price this is quite probably the finest photo editing software that can be found for either Mac or Windows. It is quite obvious why this is THE industry standard for graphical editing. It is fast (with sufficient RAM), stable, and so full of features that it can take years to discover them all. If you learn the full set of features and how to cleverly combine them there’s very little that you cannot acheive with this software.

So if your wallet and computer hardware can withstand the strain of this software there is almost no way you can go wrong with it. However, as stated before, the learning curve is fairly steep. I would describe the UI as intuitive, but there are so many features and ways to combine them that effective use does require extensive training and practice.


Tor

December 10th, 2009 at 6:46 pm    


Overall Rating55555
Usability55555
Value for Money55555
Beginner Friendly?55555

Despite the high price, despite the steep learning curve and non-intuitive interface, there is no other photo editing product that I have used that equals this one. Nothing will do a better job of making an ordinary photo extraordinary. That being said, for regular consumer use I would say Jasc PaintShop Pro with its much cheaper price tag would be fine. Outside of professional use, you have to be photo-crazy like I am to go this high end.


Andre

December 10th, 2009 at 6:46 pm    


Overall Rating55555
Usability44444
Value for Money22222
Beginner Friendly?44444

I primarily use Photoshop for painting, sketching, drawing etc, and I can safely say, it’s my favorite program for doing this sort of work. Ive tried Painter, and Sketchbook Pro, but Photoshop trumps both in terms of ease of use, and productivity. This is, of course, my own experience. But, specifically, CS4’s interface makes the work to be done off of the canvas quick and simple, so you can get back to work faster. The interface is perfect for my work too, because it fades into the background when you’re working, but when you need a tool, it’s easy to navigate and find what you want. It isn’t flashy, and doesn’t have carnival lights; it’s simple, clean, and intuitive. That’s what makes the UI for CS4 so amicable, and facilitates the whole program’s ease of use.

One thing that’s always been in the forefront of facilitating speed is the brush system. You can just pick and choose which brushes you like the most and use the most often, and remove the rest from the list, making it quick and easy to access your tools. But, I’d have to say, the most useful part of the brush system is the right click menu. Being able to right click anywhere on the canvas and change the size and softness of the brush, change brushes, create new brushes, load a new set of brushes, and all that other good stuff, is invaluable. If the Flow and Opacity controls were in there it’d be even better, but that isn’t really a complaint, the Flow and Opacity sliders are placed just fine how they are now.

I also can’t overstate the usefulness of masks, and paths/work paths. They can make tasks a snap when used right. I can’t really comment on the Filters and Image adjustments though, seeing as I hardly ever use them in painting, so I’ll move onto the last segment of the review now instead. :P

As for the extra tools of Extended, even though I do 3d modeling often, I’ve used direct painting tools before in programs like Zbrush and Mudbox, and I’d much rather take the time to properly UVmap the model, and paint the texture in Photoshop in 2D. So, I can’t comment on how worth the extra $300 that feature is for most, but I’d never use it, along with the other Extended features. Also, the rendering feature is nice an all, but I’d MUCH rather use Mental Ray.

Oh and one other thing: the plugins. Oh the plugins. A vast wealth of file formats to save to and to open. I find myself using JPEGs the most, but I use PSD (duh) GIF, PNG, TGA, and IFF often too, and occasionally BMP. I’ve never had any problems with saving to or opening any file format, and no problems with artifacting. Plus, opening image sequences is a nice thing to have when you’re rendering an animation in Mental Ray. (MR can’t render to video, it only renders individual frames)

Overall view: Buy it if you do work like mine. Your total time spent on a project will suffer if you use a lesser program. Obviously there are a lot of features I don’t know about or haven’t explored, but what the hey, no other program gives me this level of flexibility with this much ease of use, so it’s worth its weight in gold.


Jeff

December 10th, 2009 at 6:47 pm    


Overall Rating55555
Usability55555
Value for Money55555
Beginner Friendly?55555

I’m glad I finally bought the full version of Photoshop. It comes with training as well. If you are an affiliate marketer or blogger, you absolutely need this program


Leave a reply

Overall Rating
Usability
Value for Money
Beginner Friendly?

Name *

Mail *

Website